FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AT090 vs XCKU15P

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AT090 and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU15P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AT090XCKU15P
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Kintex UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)679,240836,800
LUTs as published339,620 ALMs523,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure1,180,000 LE1,143,000 SLC
DSP1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks1,968 DSP slices
Block RAM47.3 Mb34.6 Mb
Large RAM—36 Mb
Max. user I/O624668
Transceivers72 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s, 6 × XCVR 25.78 Gb/s44 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 32 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages14
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XCKU15P has about 23% more logic capacity (837K vs 679K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AT090 is built from ALMs and the XCKU15P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (340K vs 523K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCKU15P has 1,968 DSP slices against 1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AT090.

The XCKU15P has more on-chip memory (70.6 Mb vs 47.3 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 78 at up to 25.78 Gb/s on the 10AT090 and 76 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCKU15P.

The 10AT090 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCKU15P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AT090 (Arria 10) and XCKU15P (Kintex UltraScale+).