FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AT115 vs XC7V2000T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AT115 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7V2000T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AT115XC7V2000T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)854,4001,954,560
LUTs as published427,200 ALMs1,221,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure1,506,000 LE1,954,560 LC
DSP1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks2,160 DSP slices
Block RAM53 Mb45.4 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O6241,200
Transceivers72 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s, 6 × XCVR 25.78 Gb/s36 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages12
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7V2000T has about 129% more logic capacity (1955K vs 854K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AT115 is built from ALMs and the XC7V2000T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (427K vs 1222K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7V2000T has 2,160 DSP slices against 1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AT115.

The 10AT115 has more on-chip memory (53 Mb vs 45.4 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 78 at up to 25.78 Gb/s on the 10AT115 and 36 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7V2000T.

The 10AT115 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7V2000T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AT115 (Arria 10) and XC7V2000T (Virtex-7).