FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AX032 vs LAV-AT-G50

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX032 and the Lattice Avant-G LAV-AT-G50 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AX032LAV-AT-G50
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10Lattice Avant-G
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)237,460255,000
LUTs as published118,730 ALMs255,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure419,000 LE409,000 LC
DSP985 variable-precision DSP blocks1,120 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM17.4 Mb22.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O384298
Transceivers24 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 237K and 255K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the 10AX032 is built from ALMs and the LAV-AT-G50 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (119K vs 255K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-G50 has 1,120 18×18 multipliers against 985 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AX032.

The LAV-AT-G50 has more on-chip memory (22.7 Mb vs 17.4 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX032 and 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-G50.

The 10AX032 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LAV-AT-G50 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX032 (Arria 10) and LAV-AT-G50 (Avant-G).