FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AX032 vs MPF300T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX032 and the Microchip PolarFire MPF300T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AX032MPF300T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10Microchip PolarFire
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)237,460300,000
LUTs as published118,730 ALMs300,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure419,000 LE300,000 LE
DSP985 variable-precision DSP blocks924 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM17.4 Mb18.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O384512
Transceivers24 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s16 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen2 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNon-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages35
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The MPF300T has about 26% more logic capacity (300K vs 237K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AX032 is built from ALMs and the MPF300T from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (119K vs 300K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 10AX032 has 985 variable-precision DSP blocks against 924 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPF300T.

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX032 and 16 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF300T.

Configuration memory: sram on the 10AX032, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF300T.

The 10AX032 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the MPF300T with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX032 (Arria 10) and MPF300T (PolarFire).