10AX032 vs XC7K325T
A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX032 and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K325T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| 10AX032 | XC7K325T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Arria 10 | AMD Kintex-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 237,460 | 326,080 |
| LUTs as published | 118,730 ALMs | 203,800 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 419,000 LE | 326,080 LC |
| DSP | 985 variable-precision DSP blocks | 840 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 17.4 Mb | 15.6 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 384 | 500 |
| Transceivers | 24 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s | 16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x8 | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 20 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 4 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XC7K325T has about 37% more logic capacity (326K vs 237K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the 10AX032 is built from ALMs and the XC7K325T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (119K vs 204K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the 10AX032 has 985 variable-precision DSP blocks against 840 DSP slices on the XC7K325T.
The 10AX032 has more on-chip memory (17.4 Mb vs 15.6 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX032 and 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K325T.
The 10AX032 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7K325T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX032 (Arria 10) and XC7K325T (Kintex-7).