FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AX048 vs XC7VX330T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX048 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX330T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AX048XC7VX330T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)363,580326,400
LUTs as published181,790 ALMs204,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure629,000 LE326,400 LC
DSP1,368 variable-precision DSP blocks1,120 DSP slices
Block RAM28.1 Mb26.4 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O492700
Transceivers36 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s28 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 10AX048 has about 11% more logic capacity (364K vs 326K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AX048 is built from ALMs and the XC7VX330T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (182K vs 204K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 10AX048 has 1,368 variable-precision DSP blocks against 1,120 DSP slices on the XC7VX330T.

Both have transceivers: 36 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX048 and 28 at up to 13.1 Gb/s on the XC7VX330T.

The 10AX048 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VX330T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX048 (Arria 10) and XC7VX330T (Virtex-7).