FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AX066 vs XC7VX415T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX066 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX415T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AX066XC7VX415T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)501,080412,160
LUTs as published250,540 ALMs257,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure865,000 LE412,160 LC
DSP1,687 variable-precision DSP blocks2,160 DSP slices
Block RAM41.7 Mb30.9 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O696600
Transceivers48 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s48 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages23
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 10AX066 has about 22% more logic capacity (501K vs 412K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AX066 is built from ALMs and the XC7VX415T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (251K vs 258K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7VX415T has 2,160 DSP slices against 1,687 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AX066.

The 10AX066 has more on-chip memory (41.7 Mb vs 30.9 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX066 and 48 at up to 13.1 Gb/s on the XC7VX415T.

The 10AX066 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VX415T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX066 (Arria 10) and XC7VX415T (Virtex-7).