FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AX066 vs XC7VX485T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX066 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX485T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AX066XC7VX485T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)501,080485,760
LUTs as published250,540 ALMs303,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure865,000 LE485,760 LC
DSP1,687 variable-precision DSP blocks2,800 DSP slices
Block RAM41.7 Mb36.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O696700
Transceivers48 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s56 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages25
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 501K and 486K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the 10AX066 is built from ALMs and the XC7VX485T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (251K vs 304K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7VX485T has 2,800 DSP slices against 1,687 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AX066.

The 10AX066 has more on-chip memory (41.7 Mb vs 36.2 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX066 and 56 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7VX485T.

The 10AX066 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VX485T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX066 (Arria 10) and XC7VX485T (Virtex-7).