FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AX066 vs XC7VX550T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX066 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX550T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AX066XC7VX550T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)501,080554,240
LUTs as published250,540 ALMs346,400 LUT6
Vendor logic figure865,000 LE554,240 LC
DSP1,687 variable-precision DSP blocks2,880 DSP slices
Block RAM41.7 Mb41.5 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O696600
Transceivers48 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s80 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7VX550T has about 11% more logic capacity (554K vs 501K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AX066 is built from ALMs and the XC7VX550T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (251K vs 346K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7VX550T has 2,880 DSP slices against 1,687 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AX066.

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX066 and 80 at up to 13.1 Gb/s on the XC7VX550T.

The 10AX066 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VX550T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX066 (Arria 10) and XC7VX550T (Virtex-7).