FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10CL006 vs GW1NSR-4C

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone 10 LP 10CL006 and the Gowin LittleBee GW1NSR-4C using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10CL006GW1NSR-4C
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone 10 LPGowin LittleBee
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)6,0004,608
LUTs as published6,000 LUT44,608 LUT4
Vendor logic figure6,000 LE— LC
DSP15 18×18 multipliers16 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.3 Mb0.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O176106
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNone1× Cortex-M3
Process60 nm55 nm
Configuration memorySRAMEmbedded flash
Packages23
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 10CL006 has about 30% more logic capacity (6K vs 4.6K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW1NSR-4C has 16 18×18 multipliers against 15 18×18 multipliers on the 10CL006.

The 10CL006 has more on-chip memory (0.3 Mb vs 0.2 Mb).

The GW1NSR-4C includes a hard Cortex-M3 processor, while the 10CL006 does not.

Configuration memory: sram on the 10CL006, embedded flash on the GW1NSR-4C.

The 10CL006 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the GW1NSR-4C with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10CL006 (Cyclone 10 LP) and GW1NSR-4C (LittleBee).