FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10CX150 vs 5CGXC7

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone 10 GX 10CX150 and the Altera Cyclone V 5CGXC7 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10CX1505CGXC7
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone 10 GXAltera Cyclone V
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)109,540112,960
LUTs as published54,770 ALMs56,480 ALMs
Vendor logic figure150,000 LE150,000 LE
DSP156 variable-precision DSP blocks156 variable-precision DSP blocks
Block RAM9.3 Mb6.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O284480
Transceivers12 × XCVR 12.5 Gb/s9 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen1
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages35
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAltera Quartus Prime

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 110K and 113K LUT4 equivalents.

The 10CX150 has more on-chip memory (9.3 Mb vs 6.7 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the 10CX150 and 9 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the 5CGXC7.

The 10CX150 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the 5CGXC7 with Altera Quartus Prime.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10CX150 (Cyclone 10 GX) and 5CGXC7 (Cyclone V).