FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10M16 vs GW2ANR-18

A comparison of the Altera MAX 10 10M16 and the Gowin Arora II GW2ANR-18 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10M16GW2ANR-18
Vendor / familyAltera MAX 10Gowin Arora II
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)16,00020,736
LUTs as published16,000 LUT420,736 LUT4
Vendor logic figure16,000 LE— LC
DSP45 18×18 multipliers48 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.5 Mb0.8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O320384
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm55 nm
Configuration memoryInternal flashSRAM
Packages60
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW2ANR-18 has about 30% more logic capacity (20.7K vs 16K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW2ANR-18 has 48 18×18 multipliers against 45 18×18 multipliers on the 10M16.

The GW2ANR-18 has more on-chip memory (0.8 Mb vs 0.5 Mb).

Configuration memory: internal flash on the 10M16, sram on the GW2ANR-18.

The 10M16 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the GW2ANR-18 with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10M16 (MAX 10) and GW2ANR-18 (Arora II).