FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10M25 vs GW2AR-18

A comparison of the Altera MAX 10 10M25 and the Gowin Arora II GW2AR-18 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10M25GW2AR-18
Vendor / familyAltera MAX 10Gowin Arora II
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)25,00020,736
LUTs as published25,000 LUT420,736 LUT4
Vendor logic figure25,000 LE— LC
DSP55 18×18 multipliers48 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.7 Mb0.8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O360384
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm55 nm
Configuration memoryInternal flashSRAM
Packages39
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 10M25 has about 21% more logic capacity (25K vs 20.7K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the 10M25 has 55 18×18 multipliers against 48 18×18 multipliers on the GW2AR-18.

The GW2AR-18 has more on-chip memory (0.8 Mb vs 0.7 Mb).

Configuration memory: internal flash on the 10M25, sram on the GW2AR-18.

The 10M25 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the GW2AR-18 with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10M25 (MAX 10) and GW2AR-18 (Arora II).