FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10M40 vs T35

A comparison of the Altera MAX 10 10M40 and the Efinix Trion T35 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10M40T35
Vendor / familyAltera MAX 10Efinix Trion
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)40,00031,680
LUTs as published40,000 LUT4— LUT4
Vendor logic figure40,000 LE31,680 LE
DSP125 18×18 multipliers120 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM1.2 Mb1.4 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O500230
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm40 nm
Configuration memoryInternal flashSRAM
Packages53
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 10M40 has about 26% more logic capacity (40K vs 31.7K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the 10M40 has 125 18×18 multipliers against 120 18×18 multipliers on the T35.

The T35 has more on-chip memory (1.4 Mb vs 1.2 Mb).

Configuration memory: internal flash on the 10M40, sram on the T35.

The 10M40 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the T35 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10M40 (MAX 10) and T35 (Trion).