FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CEA2 vs GW3AR-20

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CEA2 and the Gowin Arora III GW3AR-20 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CEA2GW3AR-20
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VGowin Arora III
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)18,86023,040
LUTs as published9,430 ALMs23,040 LUT4
Vendor logic figure25,000 LE— LC
DSP25 variable-precision DSP blocks26 DSP blocks
Block RAM1.7 Mb1.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O224238
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm—
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages52
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW3AR-20 has about 22% more logic capacity (23K vs 18.9K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CEA2 is built from ALMs and the GW3AR-20 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (9.4K vs 23K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the GW3AR-20 has 26 DSP blocks against 25 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5CEA2.

The 5CEA2 has more on-chip memory (1.7 Mb vs 1.1 Mb).

The 5CEA2 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the GW3AR-20 with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CEA2 (Cyclone V) and GW3AR-20 (Arora III).