FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CEA2 vs LFD2NX-17

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CEA2 and the Lattice Certus-NX LFD2NX-17 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CEA2LFD2NX-17
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VLattice Certus-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)18,86014,167
LUTs as published9,430 ALMs14,167 LUT4
Vendor logic figure25,000 LE17,000 LC
DSP25 variable-precision DSP blocks24 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM1.7 Mb0.4 Mb
Large RAM—2.5 Mb
Max. user I/O22477
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages52
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CEA2 has about 33% more logic capacity (18.9K vs 14.2K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CEA2 is built from ALMs and the LFD2NX-17 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (9.4K vs 14.2K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CEA2 has 25 variable-precision DSP blocks against 24 18×18 multipliers on the LFD2NX-17.

The LFD2NX-17 has more on-chip memory (2.9 Mb vs 1.7 Mb).

The 5CEA2 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LFD2NX-17 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CEA2 (Cyclone V) and LFD2NX-17 (Certus-NX).