FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CEA4 vs LIFCL-33U

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CEA4 and the Lattice CrossLink-NX LIFCL-33U using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CEA4LIFCL-33U
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VLattice CrossLink-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)36,96027,500
LUTs as published18,480 ALMs27,500 LUT4
Vendor logic figure49,000 LE33,000 LC
DSP66 variable-precision DSP blocks64 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM3 Mb1.1 Mb
Large RAM—2.5 Mb
Max. user I/O22452
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages52
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CEA4 has about 34% more logic capacity (37K vs 27.5K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CEA4 is built from ALMs and the LIFCL-33U from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (18.5K vs 27.5K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CEA4 has 66 variable-precision DSP blocks against 64 18×18 multipliers on the LIFCL-33U.

The LIFCL-33U has more on-chip memory (3.6 Mb vs 3 Mb).

The 5CEA4 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LIFCL-33U with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CEA4 (Cyclone V) and LIFCL-33U (CrossLink-NX).