FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CEA7 vs Ti95

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CEA7 and the Efinix Titanium Ti95 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CEA7Ti95
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VEfinix Titanium
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)112,96093,200
LUTs as published56,480 ALMs— LUT4
Vendor logic figure150,000 LE93,200 LE
DSP156 variable-precision DSP blocks210 DSP blocks
Block RAM6.7 Mb4.5 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O480241
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages52
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CEA7 has about 21% more logic capacity (113K vs 93.2K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CEA7 is built from ALMs and the Ti95 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (56.5K vs —) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the Ti95 has 210 DSP blocks against 156 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5CEA7.

The 5CEA7 has more on-chip memory (6.7 Mb vs 4.5 Mb).

The 5CEA7 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the Ti95 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CEA7 (Cyclone V) and Ti95 (Titanium).