FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CEA9 vs Ti180

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CEA9 and the Efinix Titanium Ti180 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CEA9Ti180
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VEfinix Titanium
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)227,120172,800
LUTs as published113,560 ALMs172,800 LUT4
Vendor logic figure301,000 LE176,256 LE
DSP342 variable-precision DSP blocks640 DSP blocks
Block RAM11.9 Mb13.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O480284
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages45
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CEA9 has about 31% more logic capacity (227K vs 173K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CEA9 is built from ALMs and the Ti180 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (114K vs 173K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the Ti180 has 640 DSP blocks against 342 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5CEA9.

The 5CEA9 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the Ti180 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CEA9 (Cyclone V) and Ti180 (Titanium).