FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CGXC5 vs XCSU65P

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CGXC5 and the AMD Spartan UltraScale+ XCSU65P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CGXC5XCSU65P
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Spartan UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)58,16048,000
LUTs as published29,080 ALMs30,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure77,000 LE66,000 SLC
DSP150 variable-precision DSP blocks144 DSP slices
Block RAM4.4 Mb3.8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O336478
Transceivers6 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s4 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1Gen4 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages55
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CGXC5 has about 21% more logic capacity (58.2K vs 48K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CGXC5 is built from ALMs and the XCSU65P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (29.1K vs 30K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CGXC5 has 150 variable-precision DSP blocks against 144 DSP slices on the XCSU65P.

The 5CGXC5 has more on-chip memory (4.4 Mb vs 3.8 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 6 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the 5CGXC5 and 4 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCSU65P.

The 5CGXC5 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCSU65P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CGXC5 (Cyclone V) and XCSU65P (Spartan UltraScale+).