FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CSEA4 vs XC7Z010

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CSEA4 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z010 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CSEA4XC7Z010
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Zynq 7000
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)31,76028,160
LUTs as published15,880 ALMs17,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure40,000 LE28,000 LC
DSP84 variable-precision DSP blocks80 DSP slices
Block RAM2.6 Mb2.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O145100
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A92× Arm Cortex-A9
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CSEA4 has about 13% more logic capacity (31.8K vs 28.2K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CSEA4 is built from ALMs and the XC7Z010 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (15.9K vs 17.6K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CSEA4 has 84 variable-precision DSP blocks against 80 DSP slices on the XC7Z010.

The 5CSEA4 has more on-chip memory (2.6 Mb vs 2.1 Mb).

The 5CSEA4 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7Z010 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CSEA4 (Cyclone V) and XC7Z010 (Zynq 7000).