FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CSXC4 vs XC7Z012S

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CSXC4 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z012S using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CSXC4XC7Z012S
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Zynq 7000
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)31,76055,040
LUTs as published15,880 ALMs34,400 LUT6
Vendor logic figure40,000 LE55,000 LC
DSP84 variable-precision DSP blocks120 DSP slices
Block RAM2.6 Mb2.5 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O145150
Transceivers6 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s4 × GTP 6.25 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1Gen2 x4
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A91× Arm Cortex-A9
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages11
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7Z012S has about 73% more logic capacity (55K vs 31.8K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CSXC4 is built from ALMs and the XC7Z012S from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (15.9K vs 34.4K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7Z012S has 120 DSP slices against 84 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5CSXC4.

Both have transceivers: 6 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the 5CSXC4 and 4 at up to 6.25 Gb/s on the XC7Z012S.

The 5CSXC4 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7Z012S with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CSXC4 (Cyclone V) and XC7Z012S (Zynq 7000).