FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A3C 050 vs XC7Z007S

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 3 A3C 050 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z007S using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A3C 050XC7Z007S
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 3AMD Zynq 7000
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)32,00023,040
LUTs as published16,000 ALMs14,400 LUT6
Vendor logic figure47,200 LE23,000 LC
DSP65 variable-precision DSP blocks66 DSP slices
Block RAM2.4 Mb1.8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O256100
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A55 (optional)1× Arm Cortex-A9
ProcessIntel 728 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The A3C 050 has about 39% more logic capacity (32K vs 23K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A3C 050 is built from ALMs and the XC7Z007S from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (16K vs 14.4K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7Z007S has 66 DSP slices against 65 variable-precision DSP blocks on the A3C 050.

The A3C 050 has more on-chip memory (2.4 Mb vs 1.8 Mb).

The A3C 050 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7Z007S with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A3C 050 (Agilex 3) and XC7Z007S (Zynq 7000).