A3C 050 vs XC7Z010
A comparison of the Altera Agilex 3 A3C 050 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z010 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| A3C 050 | XC7Z010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Agilex 3 | AMD Zynq 7000 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 32,000 | 28,160 |
| LUTs as published | 16,000 ALMs | 17,600 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 47,200 LE | 28,000 LC |
| DSP | 65 variable-precision DSP blocks | 80 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 2.4 Mb | 2.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 256 | 100 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | 2× Arm Cortex-A55 (optional) | 2× Arm Cortex-A9 |
| Process | Intel 7 | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 2 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The A3C 050 has about 14% more logic capacity (32K vs 28.2K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the A3C 050 is built from ALMs and the XC7Z010 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (16K vs 17.6K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC7Z010 has 80 DSP slices against 65 variable-precision DSP blocks on the A3C 050.
The A3C 050 has more on-chip memory (2.4 Mb vs 2.1 Mb).
The A3C 050 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7Z010 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A3C 050 (Agilex 3) and XC7Z010 (Zynq 7000).