FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A5D 160 vs SX 2500

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 5 D-Series A5D 160 and the Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX SX 2500 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A5D 160SX 2500
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 5 D-SeriesAltera Stratix 10 GX/SX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)1,096,0001,642,300
LUTs as published548,000 ALMs821,150 ALMs
Vendor logic figure1,616,600 LE2,422,000 LE
DSP4,968 variable-precision DSP blocks5,011 variable-precision DSP blocks
Block RAM156.4 Mb195 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O8881,160
Transceivers48 × XCVR 28 Gb/s64 × XCVR 28.3 Gb/s, 32 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x4, Gen4 x8Gen3 x16
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A76 + Cortex-A55 (optional)4× Arm Cortex-A53
ProcessIntel 714 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages03
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAltera Quartus Prime

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The SX 2500 has about 50% more logic capacity (1642K vs 1096K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the SX 2500 has 5,011 variable-precision DSP blocks against 4,968 variable-precision DSP blocks on the A5D 160.

The SX 2500 has more on-chip memory (195 Mb vs 156.4 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 28 Gb/s on the A5D 160 and 96 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the SX 2500.

The A5D 160 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the SX 2500 with Altera Quartus Prime.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A5D 160 (Agilex 5 D-Series) and SX 2500 (Stratix 10 GX/SX).