AGF 006 vs XCZU7CG
A comparison of the Altera Agilex 7 F-Series AGF 006 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU7CG using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| AGF 006 | XCZU7CG | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Agilex 7 F-Series | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 388,800 | 368,000 |
| LUTs as published | 194,400 ALMs | 230,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 573,480 LE | 504,000 SLC |
| DSP | 1,640 variable-precision DSP blocks | 1,728 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 56 Mb | 11 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 27 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 576 | 464 |
| Transceivers | 32 × XCVR 58 Gb/s | 24 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | None | Gen3 x16, Gen3 x8 |
| Hard processor | 4× Arm Cortex-A53 (optional) | 2× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | Intel 7 | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 3 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 389K and 368K LUT4 equivalents.
They use different logic architectures: the AGF 006 is built from ALMs and the XCZU7CG from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (194K vs 230K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCZU7CG has 1,728 DSP slices against 1,640 variable-precision DSP blocks on the AGF 006.
The AGF 006 has more on-chip memory (56 Mb vs 38 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 32 at up to 58 Gb/s on the AGF 006 and 24 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU7CG.
The AGF 006 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCZU7CG with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: AGF 006 (Agilex 7 F-Series) and XCZU7CG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).