FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

AGF 027 vs SX 2800

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 7 F-Series AGF 027 and the Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX SX 2800 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

AGF 027SX 2800
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 7 F-SeriesAltera Stratix 10 GX/SX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)1,825,6001,866,240
LUTs as published912,800 ALMs933,120 ALMs
Vendor logic figure2,692,760 LE2,753,000 LE
DSP8,528 variable-precision DSP blocks5,760 variable-precision DSP blocks
Block RAM259 Mb229 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O7441,160
Transceivers64 × XCVR 58 Gb/s64 × XCVR 28.3 Gb/s, 32 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen3 x16
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A53 (optional)4× Arm Cortex-A53
ProcessIntel 714 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages34
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAltera Quartus Prime

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 1826K and 1866K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the AGF 027 has 8,528 variable-precision DSP blocks against 5,760 variable-precision DSP blocks on the SX 2800.

The AGF 027 has more on-chip memory (259 Mb vs 229 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 64 at up to 58 Gb/s on the AGF 027 and 96 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the SX 2800.

The AGF 027 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the SX 2800 with Altera Quartus Prime.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: AGF 027 (Agilex 7 F-Series) and SX 2800 (Stratix 10 GX/SX).