FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Certus-N2 CT16 vs GW5AT-138

A comparison of the Lattice Certus-N2 Certus-N2 CT16 and the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-138 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Certus-N2 CT16GW5AT-138
Vendor / familyLattice Certus-N2Gowin Arora V
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)98,000138,240
LUTs as published98,000 LUT4138,240 LUT4
Vendor logic figure160,000 LC— LC
DSP360 18×18 multipliers298 27×18 DSP blocks
Block RAM8 Mb6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O298312
Transceivers8 × SERDES 16 Gb/s8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen3 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm22 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages46
Design toolLattice RadiantGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW5AT-138 has about 41% more logic capacity (138K vs 98K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the Certus-N2 CT16 has 360 18×18 multipliers against 298 27×18 DSP blocks on the GW5AT-138.

The Certus-N2 CT16 has more on-chip memory (8 Mb vs 6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Certus-N2 CT16 and 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-138.

The Certus-N2 CT16 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the GW5AT-138 with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Certus-N2 CT16 (Certus-N2) and GW5AT-138 (Arora V).