FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Certus-N2 CT16 vs MPF100T

A comparison of the Lattice Certus-N2 Certus-N2 CT16 and the Microchip PolarFire MPF100T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Certus-N2 CT16MPF100T
Vendor / familyLattice Certus-N2Microchip PolarFire
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)98,000109,000
LUTs as published98,000 LUT4109,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure160,000 LC109,000 LE
DSP360 18×18 multipliers336 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM8 Mb6.9 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O298284
Transceivers8 × SERDES 16 Gb/s8 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNon-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages43
Design toolLattice RadiantMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The MPF100T has about 11% more logic capacity (109K vs 98K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the Certus-N2 CT16 has 360 18×18 multipliers against 336 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPF100T.

The Certus-N2 CT16 has more on-chip memory (8 Mb vs 6.9 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Certus-N2 CT16 and 8 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF100T.

Configuration memory: sram on the Certus-N2 CT16, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF100T.

The Certus-N2 CT16 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the MPF100T with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Certus-N2 CT16 (Certus-N2) and MPF100T (PolarFire).