FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Certus-N2 CT20 vs XC7K160T

A comparison of the Lattice Certus-N2 Certus-N2 CT20 and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K160T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Certus-N2 CT20XC7K160T
Vendor / familyLattice Certus-N2AMD Kintex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)135,000162,240
LUTs as published135,000 LUT4101,400 LUT6
Vendor logic figure220,000 LC162,240 LC
DSP520 18×18 multipliers600 DSP slices
Block RAM12 Mb11.4 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O298400
Transceivers8 × SERDES 16 Gb/s8 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages43
Design toolLattice RadiantAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7K160T has about 20% more logic capacity (162K vs 135K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the Certus-N2 CT20 is built from LUT4 and the XC7K160T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (135K vs 101K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7K160T has 600 DSP slices against 520 18×18 multipliers on the Certus-N2 CT20.

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Certus-N2 CT20 and 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K160T.

The Certus-N2 CT20 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC7K160T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Certus-N2 CT20 (Certus-N2) and XC7K160T (Kintex-7).