FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CE30 vs GW2AR-18

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CE30 and the Gowin Arora II GW2AR-18 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CE30GW2AR-18
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVGowin Arora II
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)29,00020,736
LUTs as published29,000 LUT420,736 LUT4
Vendor logic figure29,000 LE— LC
DSP66 18×18 multipliers48 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.6 Mb0.8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O532384
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm55 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages39
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The EP4CE30 has about 40% more logic capacity (29K vs 20.7K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the EP4CE30 has 66 18×18 multipliers against 48 18×18 multipliers on the GW2AR-18.

The GW2AR-18 has more on-chip memory (0.8 Mb vs 0.6 Mb).

The EP4CE30 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the GW2AR-18 with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CE30 (Cyclone IV) and GW2AR-18 (Arora II).