FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CE55 vs XC7S75

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CE55 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S75 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CE55XC7S75
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVAMD Spartan-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)56,00076,800
LUTs as published56,000 LUT448,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure56,000 LE76,800 LC
DSP154 18×18 multipliers140 DSP slices
Block RAM2.3 Mb3.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O374400
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7S75 has about 37% more logic capacity (76.8K vs 56K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the EP4CE55 is built from LUT4 and the XC7S75 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (56K vs 48K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the EP4CE55 has 154 18×18 multipliers against 140 DSP slices on the XC7S75.

The XC7S75 has more on-chip memory (3.2 Mb vs 2.3 Mb).

The EP4CE55 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7S75 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CE55 (Cyclone IV) and XC7S75 (Spartan-7).