EP4CE75 vs XC7S75
A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CE75 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S75 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| EP4CE75 | XC7S75 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Cyclone IV | AMD Spartan-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 75,000 | 76,800 |
| LUTs as published | 75,000 LUT4 | 48,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 75,000 LE | 76,800 LC |
| DSP | 200 18×18 multipliers | 140 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 2.7 Mb | 3.2 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 426 | 400 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 60 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 2 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 75K and 76.8K LUT4 equivalents.
They use different logic architectures: the EP4CE75 is built from LUT4 and the XC7S75 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (75K vs 48K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the EP4CE75 has 200 18×18 multipliers against 140 DSP slices on the XC7S75.
The XC7S75 has more on-chip memory (3.2 Mb vs 2.7 Mb).
The EP4CE75 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7S75 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CE75 (Cyclone IV) and XC7S75 (Spartan-7).