FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CGX110 vs GW5AT-138

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX110 and the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-138 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CGX110GW5AT-138
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVGowin Arora V
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)109,000138,240
LUTs as published109,000 LUT4138,240 LUT4
Vendor logic figure109,000 LE— LC
DSP280 18×18 multipliers298 27×18 DSP blocks
Block RAM5.8 Mb6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O475312
Transceivers8 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen3 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm22 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages36
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW5AT-138 has about 27% more logic capacity (138K vs 109K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW5AT-138 has 298 27×18 DSP blocks against 280 18×18 multipliers on the EP4CGX110.

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the EP4CGX110 and 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-138.

The EP4CGX110 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the GW5AT-138 with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CGX110 (Cyclone IV) and GW5AT-138 (Arora V).