FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CGX110 vs MPF100T

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX110 and the Microchip PolarFire MPF100T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CGX110MPF100T
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVMicrochip PolarFire
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)109,000109,000
LUTs as published109,000 LUT4109,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure109,000 LE109,000 LE
DSP280 18×18 multipliers336 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM5.8 Mb6.9 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O475284
Transceivers8 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s8 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen2 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNon-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages33
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 109K and 109K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the MPF100T has 336 18×18 math blocks (MACC) against 280 18×18 multipliers on the EP4CGX110.

The MPF100T has more on-chip memory (6.9 Mb vs 5.8 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the EP4CGX110 and 8 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF100T.

Configuration memory: sram on the EP4CGX110, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF100T.

The EP4CGX110 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the MPF100T with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CGX110 (Cyclone IV) and MPF100T (PolarFire).