FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CGX110 vs XC7A100T

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX110 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A100T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CGX110XC7A100T
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVAMD Artix-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)109,000101,440
LUTs as published109,000 LUT463,400 LUT6
Vendor logic figure109,000 LE101,440 LC
DSP280 18×18 multipliers240 DSP slices
Block RAM5.8 Mb4.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O475300
Transceivers8 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s8 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages34
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 109K and 101K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the EP4CGX110 is built from LUT4 and the XC7A100T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (109K vs 63.4K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the EP4CGX110 has 280 18×18 multipliers against 240 DSP slices on the XC7A100T.

The EP4CGX110 has more on-chip memory (5.8 Mb vs 4.7 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the EP4CGX110 and 8 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A100T.

The EP4CGX110 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7A100T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CGX110 (Cyclone IV) and XC7A100T (Artix-7).