FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CGX150 vs MPF100T

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX150 and the Microchip PolarFire MPF100T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CGX150MPF100T
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVMicrochip PolarFire
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)150,000109,000
LUTs as published150,000 LUT4109,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure150,000 LE109,000 LE
DSP360 18×18 multipliers336 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM6.3 Mb6.9 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O475284
Transceivers8 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s8 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen2 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNon-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages33
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The EP4CGX150 has about 38% more logic capacity (150K vs 109K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the EP4CGX150 has 360 18×18 multipliers against 336 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPF100T.

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the EP4CGX150 and 8 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF100T.

Configuration memory: sram on the EP4CGX150, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF100T.

The EP4CGX150 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the MPF100T with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CGX150 (Cyclone IV) and MPF100T (PolarFire).