FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CGX30 vs XC7A25T

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX30 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A25T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CGX30XC7A25T
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVAMD Artix-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)29,00023,360
LUTs as published29,000 LUT414,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure29,000 LE23,360 LC
DSP80 18×18 multipliers80 DSP slices
Block RAM1.1 Mb1.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O290150
Transceivers4 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s4 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The EP4CGX30 has about 24% more logic capacity (29K vs 23.4K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the EP4CGX30 is built from LUT4 and the XC7A25T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (29K vs 14.6K) are not directly comparable.

The XC7A25T has more on-chip memory (1.6 Mb vs 1.1 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 4 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the EP4CGX30 and 4 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A25T.

The EP4CGX30 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7A25T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CGX30 (Cyclone IV) and XC7A25T (Artix-7).