FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CGX75 vs GW5AT-75

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX75 and the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-75 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CGX75GW5AT-75
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVGowin Arora V
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)74,00086,688
LUTs as published74,000 LUT486,688 LUT4
Vendor logic figure74,000 LE— LC
DSP198 18×18 multipliers213 27×18 DSP blocks
Block RAM4.1 Mb4.5 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O310312
Transceivers8 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen3 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm22 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages20
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW5AT-75 has about 17% more logic capacity (86.7K vs 74K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW5AT-75 has 213 27×18 DSP blocks against 198 18×18 multipliers on the EP4CGX75.

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the EP4CGX75 and 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-75.

The EP4CGX75 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the GW5AT-75 with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CGX75 (Cyclone IV) and GW5AT-75 (Arora V).