GW1AN-1 vs LCMXO2-1200
A comparison of the Gowin Arora GW1AN-1 and the Lattice MachXO2 LCMXO2-1200 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW1AN-1 | LCMXO2-1200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora | Lattice MachXO2 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 1,152 | 1,280 |
| LUTs as published | 1,152 LUT4 | 1,280 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | — LC |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.1 Mb | 0.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 120 | 107 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Configuration memory | Embedded flash | Internal flash |
| Packages | 1 | 6 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | Lattice Diamond |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The LCMXO2-1200 has about 11% more logic capacity (1.3K vs 1.2K LUT4 equivalents).
The GW1AN-1 has more on-chip memory (0.1 Mb vs 0.1 Mb).
Configuration memory: embedded flash on the GW1AN-1, internal flash on the LCMXO2-1200.
The GW1AN-1 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LCMXO2-1200 with Lattice Diamond.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW1AN-1 (Arora) and LCMXO2-1200 (MachXO2).