GW1AN-3 vs LCMXO3D-4300
A comparison of the Gowin Arora GW1AN-3 and the Lattice MachXO3D LCMXO3D-4300 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW1AN-3 | LCMXO3D-4300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora | Lattice MachXO3D |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 3,200 | 4,300 |
| LUTs as published | 3,200 LUT4 | 4,300 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | — LC |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.1 Mb | 0.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 208 | 206 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 55 nm | — |
| Configuration memory | Embedded flash | Internal flash |
| Packages | 2 | 3 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | Lattice Diamond |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The LCMXO3D-4300 has about 34% more logic capacity (4.3K vs 3.2K LUT4 equivalents).
Configuration memory: embedded flash on the GW1AN-3, internal flash on the LCMXO3D-4300.
The GW1AN-3 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LCMXO3D-4300 with Lattice Diamond.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW1AN-3 (Arora) and LCMXO3D-4300 (MachXO3D).