FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW1N-9 vs LFD2NX-15

A comparison of the Gowin LittleBee GW1N-9 and the Lattice Certus-NX LFD2NX-15 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW1N-9LFD2NX-15
Vendor / familyGowin LittleBeeLattice Certus-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)8,64012,500
LUTs as published8,640 LUT412,500 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC15,000 LC
DSP20 18×18 multipliers12 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.5 Mb0.8 Mb
Large RAM—0.5 Mb
Max. user I/O276311
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm28 nm
Configuration memoryEmbedded flashSRAM
Packages192
Design toolGowin EDALattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LFD2NX-15 has about 45% more logic capacity (12.5K vs 8.6K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW1N-9 has 20 18×18 multipliers against 12 18×18 multipliers on the LFD2NX-15.

The LFD2NX-15 has more on-chip memory (1.3 Mb vs 0.5 Mb).

Configuration memory: embedded flash on the GW1N-9, sram on the LFD2NX-15.

The GW1N-9 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LFD2NX-15 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW1N-9 (LittleBee) and LFD2NX-15 (Certus-NX).