FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW1N-9 vs LFMXO5-15D

A comparison of the Gowin LittleBee GW1N-9 and the Lattice MachXO5-NX LFMXO5-15D using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW1N-9LFMXO5-15D
Vendor / familyGowin LittleBeeLattice MachXO5-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)8,64011,667
LUTs as published8,640 LUT411,667 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC14,000 LC
DSP20 18×18 multipliers16 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.5 Mb0.3 Mb
Large RAM—0.5 Mb
Max. user I/O276305
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm28 nm
Configuration memoryEmbedded flashInternal flash
Packages192
Design toolGowin EDALattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LFMXO5-15D has about 35% more logic capacity (11.7K vs 8.6K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW1N-9 has 20 18×18 multipliers against 16 18×18 multipliers on the LFMXO5-15D.

The LFMXO5-15D has more on-chip memory (0.8 Mb vs 0.5 Mb).

Configuration memory: embedded flash on the GW1N-9, internal flash on the LFMXO5-15D.

The GW1N-9 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LFMXO5-15D with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW1N-9 (LittleBee) and LFMXO5-15D (MachXO5-NX).