FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW1NRF-4B vs T8

A comparison of the Gowin LittleBee GW1NRF-4B and the Efinix Trion T8 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW1NRF-4BT8
Vendor / familyGowin LittleBeeEfinix Trion
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)4,6067,384
LUTs as published4,606 LUT4— LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC7,384 LE
DSP16 18×18 multipliers8 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.2 Mb0.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O2597
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processor1× ARC (32-bit)None
Process55 nm40 nm
Configuration memoryEmbedded flashSRAM
Packages03
Design toolGowin EDAEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The T8 has about 60% more logic capacity (7.4K vs 4.6K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW1NRF-4B has 16 18×18 multipliers against 8 18×18 multipliers on the T8.

The GW1NRF-4B has more on-chip memory (0.2 Mb vs 0.1 Mb).

The GW1NRF-4B includes a hard ARC (32-bit) processor, while the T8 does not.

Configuration memory: embedded flash on the GW1NRF-4B, sram on the T8.

The GW1NRF-4B is designed with Gowin EDA and the T8 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW1NRF-4B (LittleBee) and T8 (Trion).