FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW2A-18 vs LFMXO5-20TD

A comparison of the Gowin Arora II GW2A-18 and the Lattice MachXO5-NX LFMXO5-20TD using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW2A-18LFMXO5-20TD
Vendor / familyGowin Arora IILattice MachXO5-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)20,73616,667
LUTs as published20,736 LUT416,667 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC20,000 LC
DSP48 18×18 multipliers48 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.8 Mb0.7 Mb
Large RAM—0.5 Mb
Max. user I/O384368
TransceiversNone1 × SERDES
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMInternal flash
Packages133
Design toolGowin EDALattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW2A-18 has about 24% more logic capacity (20.7K vs 16.7K LUT4 equivalents).

The LFMXO5-20TD has more on-chip memory (1.2 Mb vs 0.8 Mb).

Only the LFMXO5-20TD has multi-gigabit transceivers (1).

Configuration memory: sram on the GW2A-18, internal flash on the LFMXO5-20TD.

The GW2A-18 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LFMXO5-20TD with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW2A-18 (Arora II) and LFMXO5-20TD (MachXO5-NX).