FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW2A-55 vs LFMXO5-35T

A comparison of the Gowin Arora II GW2A-55 and the Lattice MachXO5-NX LFMXO5-35T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW2A-55LFMXO5-35T
Vendor / familyGowin Arora IILattice MachXO5-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)54,72029,167
LUTs as published54,720 LUT429,167 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC35,000 LC
DSP40 18×18 multipliers48 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM2.5 Mb1.9 Mb
Large RAM—0.5 Mb
Max. user I/O608371
TransceiversNone1 × SERDES
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMInternal flash
Packages73
Design toolGowin EDALattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW2A-55 has about 88% more logic capacity (54.7K vs 29.2K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the LFMXO5-35T has 48 18×18 multipliers against 40 18×18 multipliers on the GW2A-55.

Only the LFMXO5-35T has multi-gigabit transceivers (1).

Configuration memory: sram on the GW2A-55, internal flash on the LFMXO5-35T.

The GW2A-55 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LFMXO5-35T with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW2A-55 (Arora II) and LFMXO5-35T (MachXO5-NX).