GW2AN-18X vs LCMXO3L-9400
A comparison of the Gowin Arora II GW2AN-18X and the Lattice MachXO3 LCMXO3L-9400 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW2AN-18X | LCMXO3L-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora II | Lattice MachXO3 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 20,736 | 9,400 |
| LUTs as published | 20,736 LUT4 | 9,400 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | — LC |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.5 Mb | 0.4 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 389 | 384 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 55 nm | — |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | — |
| Packages | 7 | 4 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | Lattice Diamond |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The GW2AN-18X has about 121% more logic capacity (20.7K vs 9.4K LUT4 equivalents).
The GW2AN-18X has more on-chip memory (0.5 Mb vs 0.4 Mb).
Configuration memory: sram on the GW2AN-18X, — on the LCMXO3L-9400.
The GW2AN-18X is designed with Gowin EDA and the LCMXO3L-9400 with Lattice Diamond.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW2AN-18X (Arora II) and LCMXO3L-9400 (MachXO3).