FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW3AT-6 vs iCE40LP8K

A comparison of the Gowin Arora III GW3AT-6 and the Lattice iCE40 LP/HX/LM iCE40LP8K using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW3AT-6iCE40LP8K
Vendor / familyGowin Arora IIILattice iCE40 LP/HX/LM
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)6,9127,680
LUTs as published6,912 LUT47,680 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC7,680 LC
DSP— DSP blocks— 16×16 MAC blocks
Block RAM0.3 Mb0.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O70180
Transceivers1 × SERDES 8.5 Gb/sNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process—40 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNVCM or SRAM
Packages03
Design toolGowin EDALattice iCEcube2

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The iCE40LP8K has about 11% more logic capacity (7.7K vs 6.9K LUT4 equivalents).

The GW3AT-6 has more on-chip memory (0.3 Mb vs 0.1 Mb).

Only the GW3AT-6 has multi-gigabit transceivers (1 8.5 Gb/s).

Configuration memory: sram on the GW3AT-6, nvcm or sram on the iCE40LP8K.

The GW3AT-6 is designed with Gowin EDA and the iCE40LP8K with Lattice iCEcube2.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW3AT-6 (Arora III) and iCE40LP8K (iCE40 LP/HX/LM).