FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW5A-138 vs Tz110

A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5A-138 and the Efinix Topaz Tz110 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW5A-138Tz110
Vendor / familyGowin Arora VEfinix Topaz
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)138,240128,967
LUTs as published138,240 LUT4128,967 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC120,584 LE
DSP298 27×18 DSP blocks320 DSP blocks
Block RAM6 Mb6.4 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O312274
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process22 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages13
Design toolGowin EDAEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 138K and 129K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the Tz110 has 320 DSP blocks against 298 27×18 DSP blocks on the GW5A-138.

The GW5A-138 is designed with Gowin EDA and the Tz110 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5A-138 (Arora V) and Tz110 (Topaz).