FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW5AST-138 vs Tz75

A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AST-138 and the Efinix Topaz Tz75 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW5AST-138Tz75
Vendor / familyGowin Arora VEfinix Topaz
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)138,24080,770
LUTs as published138,240 LUT480,770 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC75,520 LE
DSP298 27×18 DSP blocks264 DSP blocks
Block RAM6 Mb5.3 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O376223
Transceivers8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3 x4
Hard processor1× RISC-V AE3504× RISC-V
Process22 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages34
Design toolGowin EDAEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW5AST-138 has about 71% more logic capacity (138K vs 80.8K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW5AST-138 has 298 27×18 DSP blocks against 264 DSP blocks on the Tz75.

The GW5AST-138 has more on-chip memory (6 Mb vs 5.3 Mb).

The GW5AST-138 is designed with Gowin EDA and the Tz75 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AST-138 (Arora V) and Tz75 (Topaz).